What do you know for certain? For absolute certain?

It’s funny how rarely this question comes up. In a world full of feuding ideologies, belief systems versus belief systems, wars of information, narratives and counter-narratives,  you’d think the question of what can be known with absolute certainty would be the first place any examination of the true and the real would begin.

But it isn’t. Virtually all worldviews arise from many unquestioned, unexamined premises.

“I am this body.”

“I am separate from the world.”

“The world is as it appears to be.”

“Time is what it appears to be.”

“My thoughts about what I’m experiencing are true and accurate.”

All arguments about what’s going on in the world and how things ought to be arise from these assumptions. But can you actually know any of those things with absolute certainty? Can you know with absolute certainty that, for example, your entire experience of the world is not an elaborate Matrix-like virtual reality simulation hooked up to some unknown entity that is nothing like who you believe yourself to be? That there is in fact a world “out there” independent of your experience of it? That anything at all in your experience contains any solid reality whatsoever?

Do you actually know what this reality is? Do you know with any degree of certainty what this experience is at all?

In your memories (which may not be accurate and for all you know were uploaded into your virtual reality experience five seconds ago), there have been people telling you what this experience is and what is true and real. Many of those people are dead, and you were reading words that were attributed to them, perhaps inaccurately. Many of them died long ago, and could well have been entirely fictional. All belong to this ongoing possible hallucination that you’ve been labeling reality up until this point. Not a word that you have read or heard (including these words) can be known with certainty to be true.

Make a list of all that you can know with absolute certainty here and now, completely independent of any premise that isn’t absolutely certain. That list is much, much shorter than most people assume.

As near as I can tell, the only thing that can actually be known for certain about this experience is this experience itself. Appearances are appearing. Exactly what those appearances are and to whom they are appearing is uncertain, but it is undeniable that appearances which we can label sensory impressions, thoughts and feelings are appearing. It is impossible to detect in this experience any clear line of separation setting apart the appearances from that which is perceiving them; as far as your own present experience is concerned, the appearances and whatever is perceiving them are no more separable than a dream from its dreamer.

Everything I just said is self-evident and immediately verifiable in your own present experience here and now. Logically, if you want to have a relationship with reality that is informed by unshakeable truth, this is where you must take your stand.

Now I will say some things that are not self-evident and immediately verifiable in your own present experience here and now. Take them or leave them based on the extent to which they are interesting and useful to you:

People tend to form mental habits in early childhood which are premised upon unproven assumptions. We learn to think of the body as “me”, a “me” that is separate from a world that exists outside of it, and the complex structure of mental habits which arise from that idea is commonly referred to as the ego. In the confusion of childhood we learn a series of strategies for protecting the interests of this “me”, many of which become so habitual and ingrained that we don’t even notice them anymore. Before you know it you’re living a life that is guided by endlessly repeating mental habits formed as a small child, frequently making yourself miserable because life is too big, unpredictable and ever-changing to be skillfully responded to by childhood coping mechanisms.

It is possible to unlearn these mental habits and acquire the skill of perceiving the world from the standpoint of what can be known for certain. When you resolutely take your stand as the mysterious perceiver of mysterious appearances, which as far as you can tell is itself inseparable from those appearances, the old mental habits based on flawed assumptions begin to lose their footing. The churning, babbling mental narratives lose their “me” reference point when you are standing in the unshakeable, indisputable reality of your known, certain experience, because there is no solid “me” to be found in the experience of this mystery. Thoughts arise from source unknowable, appear to an unknowable subject, and disappear to source unknowable.

When you really get clear on the one sane place to take your stand in truth and certainty, mental habits lose the foundation of the “me” that they are premised upon. They’ll keep looping for a while, but with less and less momentum, like a ceiling fan after its power source has been switched off. Standing in the certainty of the mystery, thoughts come and go without anything to build on, like Tetris blocks falling into a bottomless hole.

And then, unimpeded by mental and perceptual habits formed on faulty premises, you can start really living. Without the labeling, dividing mind babbling about what things are and how things ought to be, life is given space to just be as it is, and it is exceedingly, thunderously beautiful. You’ll still pretend to be a “me” when you’re talking to people, and life will still give you the occasional flat tire or family emergency to deal with, but you’ll be meeting them all in a clear and responsive way instead of reacting based on old, unhelpful conditioning patterns. Even in the mysterious hallucination-Matrix-whatever mystery known as the world, you’ll be moving in a far more skillful and efficacious way.

Or maybe I’m full of it. Find out for yourself.


Internet censorship is getting pretty bad, so best way to keep seeing the stuff I publish is to get on the mailing list for my website, so you’ll get an email notification for everything I publish. My articles and podcasts are entirely reader and listener-funded, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypalor buying my book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Liked it? Take a second to support Caitlin Johnstone on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

22 responses to “Truth”

  1. https://www.radicalhappiness.com/radical-happiness
    There is nowhere that the Divine is not. Stop a moment and really take this truth in, because the mind has a very different perception. If really grasped, this truth will change your life. Everything you see, everything and everyone that exists, and everything that happens is a manifestation of the Divine. The Divine is not only behind every good act, but also behind every evil one, which is what happens when the ‘you’ that you think you are is lost in fear and the illusion of being separate. The Divine is perpetrator and victim, the lover and the hater. It plays every role that has ever been played because there is no other. There is only the illusion of other. Imagine that — there is no other! The mind is so good at imagining, but it has difficulty imagining Oneness because it goes against its programming. So when Oneness is experienced, as it is momentarily many times even in one day, it isn’t acknowledged. Oneness goes unnoticed, unappreciated by the mind. Worse than that — Oneness is rejected by the egotistical mind because acknowledging it would threaten its existence. The [false] ego doesn’t exist in Oneness; it can only exist in separateness. The [false] ego constructs and perpetuates separation. ‘Separation’ is the very definition of the [false] ego. The [false] ego and Oneness are at odds, or so it seems. However, Oneness designed life to be this way, so Oneness has no problem with the [false] ego, although the [false] ego has a problem with Oneness. Everywhere it looks, the [false] ego sees separation. It translates all the differences it sees as separation: The [false] ego sees a tree, and because the tree is different from the [false] ego’s image of itself, the [false] ego sees itself as separate from the tree. But is that true? Where did this definition of ‘self’ come from in which anything that is different from itself is seen as separate from itself? It is the [false] ego’s own definition that creates the idea of separation: Different is equal to separation by the [false] ego’s own definition. The [false] ego sees boundaries between things and people. It even creates boundaries conceptually through language and in terms of time and by holding certain beliefs. This is just how the egotistical mind digests life. All these differences are seen by the [false] ego as potentially dangerous and problematic. The [false] ego is constantly on the defense, trying to protect itself from everything out there that is different from itself. Its world is full of fear, anxiety, jealousy, hatred, anger, and pain. This viewpoint and the sense of being separate are at the base of all suffering. But reality is not as the [false] ego supposes. There are no boundaries. There is no separate self in opposition to the world. There is only the Divine that creates each fresh moment. Everything is the Divine expressing itself in the present moment as tree, as dog, as person, as thought, as emotion, as light, as sound. There are no boundaries. There is no separation. There is only Oneness. There is only Divine Grace creating and expressing itself through life in the moment.

  2. Overly broad concept, there is no such thing as truth except as an axiom or assumption for purpose of analysis. Truth is fleeting, relative, dependant on time and context, complex. Don’t search for perfection, search for good and accept what is OK.

    Someone said (approximately): The more you “know”, the more you realize that you don’t know (there is yet to learn).

    Having put that out there, here’s a pretty good approximation of truth (I think):

    BTW: Globalism destroys diversity.

  3. Thank you for this article, Caity. This work you are doing re: deconstructing “narratives,” the “brain box,” the ego, etc. is the most urgent work of all who are engaged in any/all fights for global justice. Thank you for leading the way- no other journalist is tackling this subject with such clarity and currentness. Where you say, “When you really get clear on the one sane place to take your stand in truth and certainty, mental habits lose the foundation of the “me” that they are premised upon. They’ll keep looping for a while, but with less and less momentum,Please explain how you practice…” – could you please explain how you have/do practice disrupting the ego and keep it in check. Some folks practice at this for decades… What’s your preferred practice? Thanks again–

    1. John Bestevaar Avatar
      John Bestevaar

      My personal practice is to be OK with uncertainty. Our system of economics is the opposite of that. Government must guarantee everything. Money,health, human rights,law and order. all fine with me and the proper order for a attractive society. Insurance companies touting for business by selling accident insurance and pursuing claims against municipalities is just piracy. Humans want to take risk of all kinds but we can balance by taking a good look at the uncertain bits of life.

  4. Appearances are appearing. Yup.

    Cogito ergo sum. Perhaps.

    1. Or perhaps – I observe, therefore I am?

  5. Good post. Your dreams are perhaps more real than your everyday life. Think on that one with all its bizarre pliability and abstractions!

  6. Sounds like you’ve been reading Michael Pollan’s recent book, “How to Change Your Mind”. If not, I recommend it.

    1. I will confess here that I haven’t read it but the concept of ‘mind’ is complex isn’t it? Neuro-programming and all that goes with that? My understanding so far is that ‘mind’ tends to get in the way of one’s search for ‘truth’ and ‘reality’. It throws up thoughts, ideas and ‘noise’ with regularity. I’d like to blot out such noise and let that ‘still, small voice’ come through. I’ll check out the book you’ve recommended though because maybe Pollan’s term ‘mind’ is different to that of other works on the subject.

  7. I think Caitlin is speaking of Bhuddism there is a greater reality that cannot be perceived through the Ego

  8. John Bestevaar Avatar
    John Bestevaar

    What i know for certain? That some dick called Trump or Stalin or Hitler will soon bring a load of guys with guns to make my life a misery.

  9. Susan Mercurio Avatar
    Susan Mercurio

    Wow! You are sounding all zen and Pema Chodron-like.

    She calls being comfortable with an unknowable reality “positive groundlessness.”

    As for me, I realized that I was “me” before I was two. (I have a “disorder”: hypermemory or something like that. Why do we have to pathologize everything? “Disorder?”) I’m still the same “me”.

  10. Funny that, only 3 persons and a talking snake made it to Paradise and two of them got the boot. I’m not going to tell you what I know or how I think because that would spoil you. It’s much better and more satisfying to find out for yourself instead of being told by others. All I’ll say is do not forget the rule of law and order really exists. That is a clue.

  11. “We learn to think of the body as “me”, a “me” that is separate from a world that exists outside of it, and the complex structure of mental habits which arise from that idea is commonly referred to as the ego.” If this were true people would not be disfiguring their bodies to switch sex and gender on the basis of what the ghost in the body/machine is telling them. A problem, no?

  12. Shakyamuni said much the same thing about understanding the true reality of all phenomena.

  13. I know the fiction of the state and statism is a dangerous threat to my freedom that needs to be destroyed.

    That I know is certain. It’s been demonstrated time and time again, whenever they point a gun at me with threats to conform and follow their rules.

  14. “Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position, but certainty is an absurd one.” (attributed to Voltaire). Gratitude, Caity.

  15. But, if everything I say is a lie…..

  16. The last time I read something like this was when someone was on an acid trip.

Leave a Reply