“Team Biden is soft on China,” Republican Senator Ted Cruz tweeted the other day, echoing a very common accusation that’s been leveled against the president from the right with increasing frequency.
Cruz, who biologically is mostly wetland parasites, is not being truthful. There is no evidence at this early stage that the Biden administration is “soft on China”, and there is a lot of evidence that it will be the exact opposite. Just today the president announced a new Pentagon task force dedicated to countering Beijing which will be led by a virulent China hawk who has previously attacked Trump for being too soft on China.
Antiwar‘s Dave DeCamp reports:
Pentagon officials said the task force is a “sprint effort” that will examine things like US troop presence in the region, intelligence, and the role of US allies and partners in countering China. Leading the task force is Ely Ratner, a China hawk who Biden appointed as a special advisor to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin.
Before his new position at the Pentagon, Rather worked at the interventionist Center for a New American Security (CNAS) think tank. Despite the Trump administration’s hardline policies towards Beijing, Ratner didn’t believe Trump was tough enough. In September 2020, he co-authored an op-ed titled “Trump Has Been Weak on China, and Americans Have Paid the Price.”
From his post at CNAS, Ratner led a congressionally mandated study on China that was released in January 2020. The report outlined various ways the US could compete with Beijing in Asia, including military deterrence or a “combat-credible posture in the Indo-Pacific,” as the study put it.
Biden Announces Pentagon Task Force to Review China Policy
The review will be led by #China hawk Ely Ratner who believes President Trump was 'weak' on Beijing https://t.co/xHlcQ3rvjr pic.twitter.com/7zLP3knRhj— Antiwar.com (@Antiwarcom) February 11, 2021
Biden has been vocal about his desire to “confront China’s economic abuses, counter its aggressive, coercive actions, push back on China’s attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.” His National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan has restructured the National Security Council to prioritize countering China in the Indo-Pacific. His Secretary of State Tony Blinken, who furiously agreed with Trump’s hawkish China policy, ripped Chinese officials over the treatment of Uighurs, Tibetans and Hong Kong in his very first call to Beijing after taking office. His Defense Department is sending war ships into the South China Sea.
Biden is plainly governing as a China hawk, and is giving every indication that aggressions between the two powerful nations will only get more heated in the coming years. Yet sleazy Republicans like Ted Cruz and their brainwashed supporters will keep hurling accusations of Beijing sympathies at this administration.
How do I know this will happen? Well besides the fact that it is happening already and has been in the works for months, I know it because it’s what happened last time.
Throughout his entire four years in office, Donald Trump was consistently hammered with accusations of secret Kremlin loyalty, even after the Mueller investigation failed to indict a single American for conspiring with the Russian government. These accusations did not harm Trump in any meaningful way, but they did in effect end up providing cover for him to escalate tensions against Russia more aggressively than any president since the fall of the Berlin Wall.
During the 2012 presidential race, Barack Obama mocked Mitt Romney for saying that Russia was America’s greatest geopolitical threat, saying “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back, because the Cold War has been over for 20 years.”
Just imagine, for a moment, the reaction that American liberals would have had if they’d gone directly from that kind of narrative to the scary fascist orange man accelerating toward nuclear brinkmanship with the world’s other leading nuclear weapons force. They would have freaked out about it catastrophically, because they hadn’t yet been trained to hate Russia and demand increased aggressions against Moscow. Russiagate was first and foremost a mass scale psyop born of the US intelligence cartel and advancing the pre-planned agendas of the US intelligence cartel against a longtime geostrategic target.
I said years ago that the ultimate target of Russiagate was not Trump or Russia but China, and we’re seeing that playing out now. Moscow’s increasingly close relationship with Beijing means it needs to be targeted and shoved off the world stage via economic warfare and other cold war maneuverings to weaken its ability to defend the real target China before its surging economic power can permanently end US unipolar hegemony in our world.
We are watching a slow-motion third world war play out between the US-centralized power alliance and the nations which have resisted absorption into that alliance, and propaganda plays a vital role in manufacturing public consent for the various steps that need to be taken along the way to accomplish this. That is what we’ve been seeing with Democrats and manufactured Russia hysteria, and it’s what we’re seeing with Republicans and manufactured China hysteria as well.
Team Biden is soft on China.
— Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) February 8, 2021
If you can create a situation where the leader of one political faction is escalating aggressions against a targeted nation while the other political faction is constantly accusing him of loyalty to that same nation, you’ve successfully manipulated the public into actively cheering for as many world-threatening cold war escalations as you want. Not only that but you’ve prohibited the opposite faction from putting up any resistance to these dangerous actions because they’re being politically pressured to demonstrate that they’re not “soft” on the targeted nation, pressured to show that they are in fact far more hawkish toward that nation than their accusers are.
Trump was successfully pressured to hit Russia with sanctions, menace it with an aggressive Nuclear Posture Review and troops on its border, bomb and starve its allies while tearing up crucial nuclear treaties, all while the Maddow muppets completely ignored these actions and kept insisting that Trump was acting the way you’d expect a secret Russian agent to act. The psyop worked perfectly. So why change the formula?
Biden will continue to roll out aggressions against China while the rightist political/media class keeps churning out narratives that he is soft on China. Rank-and-file right wingers will be manipulated into clapping along by mass media propaganda and by internet psyops feeding them nonsense about Hunter Biden’s laptop proving that his father is owned by the CCP. It won’t look exactly the same as Russiagate because the subjects and demographics are not the same, but the end result will be: the escalation of the slow-motion third world war against the world’s most powerful unabsorbed governments.
This is such a perfect example of the way the Democratic and Republican Parties function like the jab-cross punch combination in boxing, each working together to set each other up for knockout blows. They don’t look the same, and they aren’t used in exactly the same ways, but they’re both used in conjunction to advance the same goal: punching the rest of humanity in the face until it falls.
__________________________
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my new book Poems For Rebels (you can also download a PDF for five bucks) or my old book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
72 responses to “Biden Will Escalate Aggressions Against China While Republicans Call Him A Beijing Puppet”
Start generating extra cash online from home more than $52k by doing very easy work just in spare time. Last month I got paid $52745 from this easy home job. Join fgh this job right now and make more cash every month online. Just follow the web link here to get started……
Open This Website……………..
●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started….
==================●
You lost me at “wetland parasites”. Grow up.
The district of columbia is essentially a foreign government. It is a criminal and inhuman entity. All of its extensions overseas reflect this obvious fact just as it is reflected in America. All of the functional patterns and all of the policies and behaviours towards actual human beings are always exactly the same.
All sane and rational human beings should refrain from having, or even pretending to have, any relations with the criminal and inhuman entity that dc actually is.
You’ve been quoted by RT news
The capitalists are so greedy, they will sell us the bullet’s we shoot them with. Well, they let China get too big and too strong that any nation or combination of nation’s can put the genie back in the bottle. While the West was busy saving banksters, China built more K of high speed rail than the rest of the world.. the US still runs diesel electric trains on wodden ties. The UK is so deindustrialized, the Germans built their cars and the French run their nuclear power plants. Wall Street and the City of London are their economics, producing nothing, only extracting wealth from the few producers left. Of course, they have nukes but Russia has just as many and China has enough so no checkmate here ..A long slow decline is all the anglosphere can expect and the rest of Europe with it unless they smarten up. Europe and Russia are perfect together but so are Russia and China and the US and Europe are driving the bear into the arms of the dragon. Such stupidity, such arrogance and hubris and dare I say racism. If the world can be saved at this point, it will be China doing it.
https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/chrystia-freeland-rhodes-scholar?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=copy
Sorry, I had no other way;
* Inbox5960 Edit
* Archive0 Edit
* Drafts236 Edit
* Spam59 Edit
* Sent0 Edit
* Trash0 Edit
* Amazon0 Edit
* Amazon 0 Edit
* ArcelorMittal exit report0 Edit
* Bait & swich0 Edit
* Bills to Pay5 Edit
* Cats5 Edit
* Dhl-daily sale0 Edit
* Eileen0 Edit
* Fliers, Letters, Headers, Logos0 Edit
* Greenville Post0 Edit
* John9 Edit
* Online digest0 Edit
* Pending14 Edit
* Personal1 Edit
* Pinzoo4 Edit
* Replies0 Edit
* Ripoffs0 Edit
* TAIC1 Edit
* TAIC20 Edit
* Tay’s Hours14 Edit
* Twigby.com 0 Edit
* Walmart0 Edit
* WTF5 Edit
* Tay utube0 Edit
* Ying Shah0 Edit
Storage is 60% full
Using 1.2 GB of 2 GB
Create FolderEdit
Find
Chrystia Freeland: Rhodes Scholar Trustee of the WEF, Deputy PM of Canada and the Failure of the ‘Super Elite’
BackView fullscreen
PreviousNext
Chrystia Freeland: Rhodes Scholar Trustee of the WEF, Deputy PM of Canada and the Failure of the ‘Super Elite’
Matthew Ehret
View this post on the web at https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJxVkM1yhCAQhJ9mua2FgKgHDrnkNSh-RiVRsGDMlm8fXC9J1cxcurp6-nMGYU75VHsqSK6j8dxBRXiVFRAhk6N A1sErJnomBKfEK-HboRtIKHrKAJsJq8J8ANkPuwZnMKT4dkhKRUcWxc3laCewXnTSMCqMl3aUnEpnnZ3uYHP4ANGBgh_IZ4pAVrUg7uXBPx7ss85mEBd4wZI
3:05 PM (1 hour ago)
3:05 PM (2 hours ago)Mark as Unread to dog69@fastmail.jp Reply More
FromMatthew Ehret
Reply-ToMatthew Ehret
Todog69@fastmail.jp
SubjectChrystia Freeland: Rhodes Scholar Trustee of the WEF, Deputy PM of Canada and the Failure of the ‘Super Elite’
DateThursday, February 11, 2021 3:04 PM
Size107 KB
Remote images blocked to protect your privacy. Load images.
Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland has become a bit of a living parody of everything wrong with the detached technocratic neo-liberal order which has driven the world through 50 years of post-industrial decay. As the February 2, 2021 National Post coverage
Chrystia Freeland: Rhodes Scholar Trustee of the WEF, Deputy PM of Canada and the Failure of the ‘Super Elite’
Matthew Ehret
Feb 11 Comment Share
Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland has become a bit of a living parody of everything wrong with the detached technocratic neo-liberal order which has driven the world through 50 years of post-industrial decay.
As the February 2, 2021 National Post coverage of Freeland’s leading role as trustee of the World Economic Forum makes clear: Her role as Deputy Prime Minister of Canada (which is nominally a position devoted to protecting the interests of Canadians) creates more than a small conflict of interest. The WEF Great Reset agenda is, after all, nothing more than a dystopic program aimed at deconstructing industrial civilization under the cover of COVID-19 and this is not something which benefits any nation.
It is also important to keep in mind that the technocratic globalists whom Freeland represents have worked hard to undo the aberration of Donald Trump which profoundly altered the sacred script which had been obeyed for so many decades without much resistance. Even though Biden was imposed onto the American people this year, it is vital to recall that the script is profoundly flawed, and Trump’s 2016 victory was but one display of that.
Having been set up as a counterpart to the steely Hillary Clinton who was supposed to win the 2016 election, Freeland and her ilk have demonstrated their outdated thinking in everything they have set out to achieve since the 2014 coup in Ukraine. Certainly before that, everything seemed to be going smoothly enough for End of History disciples promoting a script that was supposed to culminate in a long-sought for “New World Order”.
The Script up until Now
Things were going especially well since the collapse of the Soviet system in the early 1990s. The collapse ushered in a unipolar world order with the European Union and NAFTA, followed soon thereafter by the World Trade Organization and the 1999 destruction of Glass-Steagall (1). The trans-Atlantic at last was converted into a cage of “post-sovereign nations” that no longer had actual control of their own powers of credit generation. Under NATO, even national militaries were subject to technocratic control. This cage was perfect for the governing elite “scientifically managing” from above while the little people bickered over their diminishing employment and standards of living from below.
Even though the former Soviet bloc nations were in tatters by 1992, their sovereign powers could only be undone by applying the liberalization process which took 30 years in the west in a short space of only a decade. This was done under the direction of such monetarist “reformers” such as Anatoly Chubais and Yegor Gaidar under Yeltsin. Similar privatization and liberalization reforms were applied viciously to Ukraine and other Warsaw pact countries during the same period. Those pirates that became the “nouveau riche” of the west were joined by such contemporary modern oligarchs such as Oleg Deripaska, Boris Berezovksy, Mikhail Fridman, Roman Abramovich in Russia, alongside Petro Poroshenko, Rinat Akhmetov, Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Viktor Pinchuk of Ukraine (to name a few). Not to forget their spiritual roots, many of these oligarchs soon purchased houses in the swank upmarket sections of London which has come to be known as “Moscow on Thames.” (2)
By the end of the 1990s a new phase of this de-nationalization was unleashed with the unveiling of the Blair doctrine explicitly calling for a “post-Westphalia” world order which unleashed a wave of hellish regime change wars in the Arab World beginning with 9-11, and with a long term intention to target Libya, Syria, Iran, and Lebanon while expanding NATO’s hegemony against the potential re-emergence of Russia and China.
The Economic Meltdown Was Always the Intention
Let’s be clear: the whole point of the post-1971 world was directed with the intention of destroying the moral-political and economic foundations for western society. The belief in scientific progress and industrial growth was the cause of all true progress from the 15th century Golden Renaissance to the assassinations of the 1960s. The intended consequences of this post-1971 (zero growth) policy were:
1) The destruction of the productive forces of labor vis a vis outsourcing to “cheap labour markets” driven by shareholder profit.
2) The consolidation of wealth into an ever smaller array of private multi-billionaire owners under a logic of Darwinian survival of the fittest.
3) The creation of a vast speculative bubble supported by ever greater rates of unpayable debt and totally detached from the physically productive forces of reality.
Just like 1929, after years of speculation known as the roaring twenties, the “plug could be pulled” on the bubble in order to impose a bit of shock therapy onto a sleeping population who would beg for fascism as a solution if only it would put bread on their tables. Though this plan failed 80 years ago due to the American rejection of fascism under President Roosevelt, the belief that the formula could succeed in the 21st century was adhered to most closely as long as America was brought firmly under control of the City of London and their Wall Street lackies (3).
Although the fascist “solution” to their manufactured crisis was put down during WWII, this new attempt was premised upon the policy that a new system of Global Government managed by draconian regulation would be imposed under a “Green New Deal” framework whereby the instruments of banking regulation, state directed capital and centralized government (not evils unto themselves), would be directed only to green, low energy flux density forms of energy which inherently lower the population of the earth. This is very different from the protectionism, bank regulation, state credit and central authority exerted by America during the 1930s New Deal (or Eurasian New Silk Road policy today). The difference is that one system empowers sovereign nations, and increases the productive powers of labor and energy flux density of humanity while increasing quality of life, the other “Green” agenda has the opposite effect whereby monetary incentives are tied to decreasing the “carbon footprint” of the earth. The image of a drug addict getting paid heroine as an incentive to bleed himself to death is useful here.
With the slow collapse of first world economies after the assassination of nationalist leaders in the 1960s, the plan for depopulation and global government seemed to be unfolding without serious opposition.
The Role of Chrystia Freeland
Freeland’s bizarre role in this whole affair was to do what every good Rhodes Scholar is conditioned to do upon their completion of their indoctrination at Oxford: facilitate the tough transition of the “pre-collapse” world economy into a new operating system that was meant to be the “green post-collapse” world economy. It wasn’t going to be easy to tell a new “pirate class” of billionaires that they would have to accept losing much of their wealth (less population equals less money), and operate under a strict new global operating system of regulation necessary to contract the society. The Rhodes Scholarship program begun in 1902 to advance a re-organized British Empire and had worked alongside the Fabian Society for over a century producing more than 7000 scholars who have permeated across all fields of society (media, education, government, military and corporate).
In his 1877 will, Cecil Rhodes said this group should be “a society which should have its members in every part of the British Empire working with one object and one idea we should have its members placed at our universities and our schools and should watch the English youth passing through their hands just one perhaps in every thousand would have the mind and feelings for such an object, he should be tried in every way, he should be tested whether he is endurant, possessed of eloquence, disregardful of the petty details of life, and if found to be such, then elected and bound by oath to serve for the rest of his life in his Country. He should then be supported if without means by the Society and sent to that part of the Empire where it was felt he was needed.”
After leaving Oxford in 1993, Chrystia Freeland learned the ropes of “perception management” by working for the London Economist, Washington Post, Financial times and Globe and Mail and Reuters. After serving a stint as editor-at-large of Reuters, the time had come for her to play the role of Valery Jarrett to the “Barack Obama” of Canada then being prepped for Prime Ministership of Justin Trudeau.
She was perfect.
As an asset of the global propaganda system, Freeland had made high level contacts with those Ukrainian, Russian, and Western oligarchs mentioned above including Viktor Pinchuk and Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Larry Summers, George Soros and Al Gore, were just a few players in the west whom she considered her “close friends” and whom she was happy to bring into Canada during the period of re-organization of the Liberal Party (2011-2014) as it prepared to take power under the banner of the Canada 2020 think tank. What made Freeland even more special was that she was bred from a zealous family of Ukrainian nationalists under the patriarchy of her Nazi grandfather Michael Chomiak. This network was brought to Canada after WWII by Anglo-American intelligence and cultivated as a force with ties to pro-Nazi Ukrainian counterparts ever since.
Freeland’s admission into politics was managed by another Rhodes Scholar named Bob Rae who served as interim controller of the Liberal Party during several of the Harper years and was a major player in Canada 2020. Rae, who had been the NDP Premier of Ontario from 1990-1995 was happy to abdicate his seat to Freeland ensuring her entry into Trudeau’s inner circle and thus becoming his official handler (4).
Freeland Promotes the New Global Elite
Freeland has made it clear that she understands well that there is a fundamental difference in cultural identities of the “new rich” relative to the older oligarchic families which she serves. In the 2011 Rise of the New Global Elite, she describes it as follows:
“To grasp the difference between today’s plutocrats and the hereditary elite, who “grow rich in their sleep” one need merely glance at the events that now fill high-end social calendars.”
Freeland then breaks down the categories of “new plutocrats” into two subcategories: the good, technocratic friendly plutocrats who are ideologically compatible with the New World Order of depopulation, such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, George Soros, et al and the “bad” plutocrats who tend not to conform to the British Empire’s program of global governance and depopulation under the green agenda. In Freeland’s world “good oligarchs” are those who adhere to this agenda, while “bad oligarchs” are those who do not. Trump is a terrible Plutocrat, and – Viktor Yanukovych was a good plutocrat until he decided to not sacrifice Ukraine on the altar of the collapsing European Union and chose to throw Ukraine’s destiny into the Eurasian Economic Union in October 2013.
In the same paper, Freeland wrote:
“if the plutocrats’ opposition to increases in their taxes and tighter regulation of their economic activities is understandable, it is also a mistake. The real threat facing the super-elite, at home and abroad, isn’t modestly higher taxes, but rather the possibility that inchoate public rage could cohere into a more concrete populist agenda– that, for instance, middle-class Americans could conclude that the world economy isn’t working for them and decide that protectionism… is preferable to incremental measures.” Quoting billionaire Mohamed El-Erian, the CEO of Pimco she wrote: “one of the big surprises of 2010 is that the protectionist dog didn’t bark.”
Freeland ended her article with this message:
“The lesson of history is that, in the long run, super-elites have two ways to survive: by suppressing dissent or by sharing their wealth… Let us hope the plutocrats aren’t already too isolated to recognize this”.
But what does Freeland really think of the technocratic management under a plutocratic governance of society? In Plutocrats vs. Populists (Nov. 2013), Freeland lets her pro-plutocratic worldview out of the bag when she gushes:
“At its best, this form of plutocratic political power offers the tantalizing possibility of policy practiced at the highest professional level with none of the messiness and deal making and venality of traditional politics… a technocratic, data-based, objective search for solutions to our problems”
Since a technocratic managerial class committed to a common ideology must be solidified for this system to work, Freeland goes on to make the case to recruit young people to the imperial civil service:
“Smart, publicly minded technocrats go to work for plutocrats whose values they share. The technocrats get to focus full time on the policy issues they love, without the tedium of building, rallying– and serving– a permanent mass membership. They can be pretty well paid to boot.”
The End of a Delusion?
Now that Russia and China’s new operating system shaped by the Belt and Road Initiative has created a force of opposition to this British-run Deep State design, nothing which those would-be gods of Olympus have attempted to achieve has succeeded. Syria has continued to resist regime change while Arab nations are increasingly joining China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Venezuela has failed to fall the way so many regimes have done before 2014. Trudeau’s usefulness has withered away and now the decision appears to be seriously humored whether Freeland will take the reins of Canada after Trudeau is eliminated in order to impose a dystopic Great Reset of world government, depopulation and the dream of Cecil Rhodes. While the universe may be organized by a principle of reason, no one can say the same applies to the mind of an oligarchic.
Notes
(1) The separation of speculative from commercial banking was the bedrock of financial regulation since its implementation in 1933. Its destruction as Clinton’s last act in office resulted in the creation of the largest bubble in history amounting to a $1.5 quadrillion derivatives time bomb now ready to explode.
(2) When Putin began exiling many of these unrepentant oligarchs, they quickly made their way to London where many became disposable playthings of the British Empire.
(3) The self-professed “Fabian Society of Canada” was set up in the height of the Depression by five Rhodes Scholars in order to create a Canadian fascist regime in 1932. This organization known as the League of Social Reconstruction, set up a political party called the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) which later changed its name to the New Democratic Party (NDP) in 1961. While good people have found themselves members of the NDP and Liberals over the years, it is useful to keep in mind that this rotten core tied to the highest echelons of the British oligarchy are real.
(4) It is a useful point to make here that as Premier of Ontario Bob Rae brought in Maurice Strong as President of Ontario Hydro from 1992-1994 during which time Canada’s nuclear sector was nearly shut down and a prototype for a “green New Deal” was applied. Strong had famously described a “fiction book he wished to write someday saying: “What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow, BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation.
Comment Share
If you liked this post from Matt Ehret’s Insights, why not share it?
Share
© 2021 Matthew Ehret Unsubscribe
PO Box 37355, MTL, Quebec, CP Marquette
H2E 3B5
Publish on Substack
dog69
<https://email.mg2.substack.com/c/eJxVkk1z2jAQhn8NvsUjS7JsH3ygoRS1gZaWEujFI0trLPBXLDlgfn3lcGlndnXQq91Xs89KYeHU9mPatcZ60 5HZsYO0gaupwFrovcFAn2mVYhphSgnyVEpVEIexp01W9AC10FVq-wG8bsgrLYXVbfNRwRCioVemBQ2TqECJZCiXCagC5YRIHDNVhBAn7GEsBqWhkZDCO_Rj2 4BXpaW1nZmR-QwvXdTC2hKuUPZgfTPkxgp58WVbO61zKct-NFaLp-lblWjUU1-2CsyTkWVbiX5Glra9QDMjCxi_BhLvxwOuLvzcjpuFdLm9r5-vWn5J7mqZd
Draft
DraftMark as Unread to Matthew Ehret
Edit Draft
Fromdog69@fastmail.jp
ToMatthew Ehret
SubjectRe: Chrystia Freeland: Rhodes Scholar Trustee of the WEF, Deputy PM of Canada and the Failure of the ‘Super Elite’
DateThursday, February 11, 2021 4:18 PM
Size118 KB
Draft
Show quoted text
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:04 PM, Matthew Ehret wrote:
>
> Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland has become a bit of a living parody of everything wrong with the detached technocratic neo-liberal order which has driven the world through 50 years of post-industrial decay. As the February 2, 2021 National Post coverage
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Chrystia Freeland: Rhodes Scholar Trustee of the WEF, Deputy PM of Canada and the Failure of the ‘Super Elite’
>
> Matthew Ehret
> Feb 11
>
> Comment
> Share
> Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland has become a bit of a living parody of everything wrong with the detached technocratic neo-liberal order which has driven the world through 50 years of post-industrial decay.
> As the February 2, 2021 National Post coverage of Freeland’s leading role as trustee of the World Economic Forum makes clear: Her role as Deputy Prime Minister of Canada (which is nominally a position devoted to protecting the interests of Canadians) creates more than a small conflict of interest. The WEF Great Reset agenda is, after all, nothing more than a dystopic program aimed at deconstructing industrial civilization under the cover of COVID-19 and this is not something which benefits any nation.
> It is also important to keep in mind that the technocratic globalists whom Freeland represents have worked hard to undo the aberration of Donald Trump which profoundly altered the sacred script which had been obeyed for so many decades without much resistance. Even though Biden was imposed onto the American people this year, it is vital to recall that the script is profoundly flawed, and Trump’s 2016 victory was but one display of that.
> Having been set up as a counterpart to the steely Hillary Clinton who was supposed to win the 2016 election, Freeland and her ilk have demonstrated their outdated thinking in everything they have set out to achieve since the 2014 coup in Ukraine. Certainly before that, everything seemed to be going smoothly enough for End of History disciples promoting a script that was supposed to culminate in a long-sought for “New World Order”.
>
>
>
>
> The Script up until Now
> Things were going especially well since the collapse of the Soviet system in the early 1990s. The collapse ushered in a unipolar world order with the European Union and NAFTA, followed soon thereafter by the World Trade Organization and the 1999 destruction of Glass-Steagall (1). The trans-Atlantic at last was converted into a cage of “post-sovereign nations” that no longer had actual control of their own powers of credit generation. Under NATO, even national militaries were subject to technocratic control. This cage was perfect for the governing elite “scientifically managing” from above while the little people bickered over their diminishing employment and standards of living from below.
> Even though the former Soviet bloc nations were in tatters by 1992, their sovereign powers could only be undone by applying the liberalization process which took 30 years in the west in a short space of only a decade. This was done under the direction of such monetarist “reformers” such as Anatoly Chubais and Yegor Gaidar under Yeltsin. Similar privatization and liberalization reforms were applied viciously to Ukraine and other Warsaw pact countries during the same period. Those pirates that became the “nouveau riche” of the west were joined by such contemporary modern oligarchs such as Oleg Deripaska, Boris Berezovksy, Mikhail Fridman, Roman Abramovich in Russia, alongside Petro Poroshenko, Rinat Akhmetov, Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Viktor Pinchuk of Ukraine (to name a few). Not to forget their spiritual roots, many of these oligarchs soon purchased houses in the swank upmarket sections of London which has come to be known as “Moscow on Thames.” (2)
> By the end of the 1990s a new phase of this de-nationalization was unleashed with the unveiling of the Blair doctrine explicitly calling for a “post-Westphalia” world order which unleashed a wave of hellish regime change wars in the Arab World beginning with 9-11, and with a long term intention to target Libya, Syria, Iran, and Lebanon while expanding NATO’s hegemony against the potential re-emergence of Russia and China.
> The Economic Meltdown Was Always the Intention
> Let’s be clear: the whole point of the post-1971 world was directed with the intention of destroying the moral-political and economic foundations for western society. The belief in scientific progress and industrial growth was the cause of all true progress from the 15th century Golden Renaissance to the assassinations of the 1960s. The intended consequences of this post-1971 (zero growth) policy were:
> 1) The destruction of the productive forces of labor vis a vis outsourcing to “cheap labour markets” driven by shareholder profit.
> 2) The consolidation of wealth into an ever smaller array of private multi-billionaire owners under a logic of Darwinian survival of the fittest.
> 3) The creation of a vast speculative bubble supported by ever greater rates of unpayable debt and totally detached from the physically productive forces of reality.
> Just like 1929, after years of speculation known as the roaring twenties, the “plug could be pulled” on the bubble in order to impose a bit of shock therapy onto a sleeping population who would beg for fascism as a solution if only it would put bread on their tables. Though this plan failed 80 years ago due to the American rejection of fascism under President Roosevelt, the belief that the formula could succeed in the 21st century was adhered to most closely as long as America was brought firmly under control of the City of London and their Wall Street lackies (3).
> Although the fascist “solution” to their manufactured crisis was put down during WWII, this new attempt was premised upon the policy that a new system of Global Government managed by draconian regulation would be imposed under a “Green New Deal” framework whereby the instruments of banking regulation, state directed capital and centralized government (not evils unto themselves), would be directed only to green, low energy flux density forms of energy which inherently lower the population of the earth. This is very different from the protectionism, bank regulation, state credit and central authority exerted by America during the 1930s New Deal (or Eurasian New Silk Road policy today). The difference is that one system empowers sovereign nations, and increases the productive powers of labor and energy flux density of humanity while increasing quality of life, the other “Green” agenda has the opposite effect whereby monetary incentives are tied to decreasing the “carbon footprint” of the earth. The image of a drug addict getting paid heroine as an incentive to bleed himself to death is useful here.
> With the slow collapse of first world economies after the assassination of nationalist leaders in the 1960s, the plan for depopulation and global government seemed to be unfolding without serious opposition.
> The Role of Chrystia Freeland
> Freeland’s bizarre role in this whole affair was to do what every good Rhodes Scholar is conditioned to do upon their completion of their indoctrination at Oxford: facilitate the tough transition of the “pre-collapse” world economy into a new operating system that was meant to be the “green post-collapse” world economy. It wasn’t going to be easy to tell a new “pirate class” of billionaires that they would have to accept losing much of their wealth (less population equals less money), and operate under a strict new global operating system of regulation necessary to contract the society. The Rhodes Scholarship program begun in 1902 to advance a re-organized British Empire and had worked alongside the Fabian Society for over a century producing more than 7000 scholars who have permeated across all fields of society (media, education, government, military and corporate).
> In his 1877 will, Cecil Rhodes said this group should be “a society which should have its members in every part of the British Empire working with one object and one idea we should have its members placed at our universities and our schools and should watch the English youth passing through their hands just one perhaps in every thousand would have the mind and feelings for such an object, he should be tried in every way, he should be tested whether he is endurant, possessed of eloquence, disregardful of the petty details of life, and if found to be such, then elected and bound by oath to serve for the rest of his life in his Country. He should then be supported if without means by the Society and sent to that part of the Empire where it was felt he was needed.”
> After leaving Oxford in 1993, Chrystia Freeland learned the ropes of “perception management” by working for the London Economist, Washington Post, Financial times and Globe and Mail and Reuters. After serving a stint as editor-at-large of Reuters, the time had come for her to play the role of Valery Jarrett to the “Barack Obama” of Canada then being prepped for Prime Ministership of Justin Trudeau.
> She was perfect.
> As an asset of the global propaganda system, Freeland had made high level contacts with those Ukrainian, Russian, and Western oligarchs mentioned above including Viktor Pinchuk and Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Larry Summers, George Soros and Al Gore, were just a few players in the west whom she considered her “close friends” and whom she was happy to bring into Canada during the period of re-organization of the Liberal Party (2011-2014) as it prepared to take power under the banner of the Canada 2020 think tank. What made Freeland even more special was that she was bred from a zealous family of Ukrainian nationalists under the patriarchy of her Nazi grandfather Michael Chomiak. This network was brought to Canada after WWII by Anglo-American intelligence and cultivated as a force with ties to pro-Nazi Ukrainian counterparts ever since.
> Freeland’s admission into politics was managed by another Rhodes Scholar named Bob Rae who served as interim controller of the Liberal Party during several of the Harper years and was a major player in Canada 2020. Rae, who had been the NDP Premier of Ontario from 1990-1995 was happy to abdicate his seat to Freeland ensuring her entry into Trudeau’s inner circle and thus becoming his official handler (4).
> Freeland Promotes the New Global Elite
> Freeland has made it clear that she understands well that there is a fundamental difference in cultural identities of the “new rich” relative to the older oligarchic families which she serves. In the 2011 Rise of the New Global Elite, she describes it as follows:
> “To grasp the difference between today’s plutocrats and the hereditary elite, who “grow rich in their sleep” one need merely glance at the events that now fill high-end social calendars.”
> Freeland then breaks down the categories of “new plutocrats” into two subcategories: the good, technocratic friendly plutocrats who are ideologically compatible with the New World Order of depopulation, such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, George Soros, et al and the “bad” plutocrats who tend not to conform to the British Empire’s program of global governance and depopulation under the green agenda. In Freeland’s world “good oligarchs” are those who adhere to this agenda, while “bad oligarchs” are those who do not. Trump is a terrible Plutocrat, and – Viktor Yanukovych was a good plutocrat until he decided to not sacrifice Ukraine on the altar of the collapsing European Union and chose to throw Ukraine’s destiny into the Eurasian Economic Union in October 2013.
> In the same paper, Freeland wrote:
> “if the plutocrats’ opposition to increases in their taxes and tighter regulation of their economic activities is understandable, it is also a mistake. The real threat facing the super-elite, at home and abroad, isn’t modestly higher taxes, but rather the possibility that inchoate public rage could cohere into a more concrete populist agenda– that, for instance, middle-class Americans could conclude that the world economy isn’t working for them and decide that protectionism… is preferable to incremental measures.” Quoting billionaire Mohamed El-Erian, the CEO of Pimco she wrote: “one of the big surprises of 2010 is that the protectionist dog didn’t bark.”
> Freeland ended her article with this message:
> “The lesson of history is that, in the long run, super-elites have two ways to survive: by suppressing dissent or by sharing their wealth… Let us hope the plutocrats aren’t already too isolated to recognize this”.
> But what does Freeland really think of the technocratic management under a plutocratic governance of society? In Plutocrats vs. Populists (Nov. 2013), Freeland lets her pro-plutocratic worldview out of the bag when she gushes:
> “At its best, this form of plutocratic political power offers the tantalizing possibility of policy practiced at the highest professional level with none of the messiness and deal making and venality of traditional politics… a technocratic, data-based, objective search for solutions to our problems”
> Since a technocratic managerial class committed to a common ideology must be solidified for this system to work, Freeland goes on to make the case to recruit young people to the imperial civil service:
> “Smart, publicly minded technocrats go to work for plutocrats whose values they share. The technocrats get to focus full time on the policy issues they love, without the tedium of building, rallying– and serving– a permanent mass membership. They can be pretty well paid to boot.”
> The End of a Delusion?
> Now that Russia and China’s new operating system shaped by the Belt and Road Initiative has created a force of opposition to this British-run Deep State design, nothing which those would-be gods of Olympus have attempted to achieve has succeeded. Syria has continued to resist regime change while Arab nations are increasingly joining China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Venezuela has failed to fall the way so many regimes have done before 2014. Trudeau’s usefulness has withered away and now the decision appears to be seriously humored whether Freeland will take the reins of Canada after Trudeau is eliminated in order to impose a dystopic Great Reset of world government, depopulation and the dream of Cecil Rhodes. While the universe may be organized by a principle of reason, no one can say the same applies to the mind of an oligarchic.
> Notes
> (1) The separation of speculative from commercial banking was the bedrock of financial regulation since its implementation in 1933. Its destruction as Clinton’s last act in office resulted in the creation of the largest bubble in history amounting to a $1.5 quadrillion derivatives time bomb now ready to explode.
> (2) When Putin began exiling many of these unrepentant oligarchs, they quickly made their way to London where many became disposable playthings of the British Empire.
> (3) The self-professed “Fabian Society of Canada” was set up in the height of the Depression by five Rhodes Scholars in order to create a Canadian fascist regime in 1932. This organization known as the League of Social Reconstruction, set up a political party called the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) which later changed its name to the New Democratic Party (NDP) in 1961. While good people have found themselves members of the NDP and Liberals over the years, it is useful to keep in mind that this rotten core tied to the highest echelons of the British oligarchy are real.
> (4) It is a useful point to make here that as Premier of Ontario Bob Rae brought in Maurice Strong as President of Ontario Hydro from 1992-1994 during which time Canada’s nuclear sector was nearly shut down and a prototype for a “green New Deal” was applied. Strong had famously described a “fiction book he wished to write someday saying: “What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
> Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow, BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation.
>
> Comment
> Share
>
> If you liked this post from Matt Ehret’s Insights, why not share it?
> Share
I’m ashamed that Freeland got royalty money from me buying her book “Plutocrats”; she is a very smart piece of work. The current PM, Trudeau is a very lightweight, very woke non leader. He must have inherited >99% of his dna from his airhead, flake mother; he has none of the good qualities of his father Pierre. I remember Bob Rae and that airhead Maurice Strong destroying what was one of the best Electrical utilities in N America; setting it up for privatization by the next few government’s of Tory and Grit quislings. Pierre IMHO was the last Canadian PM, the rest have been the toads of international capital. If I had known what was coming, I would have left for Denmark before 1970. Lengthy but full of information post. Anyhow, I’m glad I lived through the best the world had to offer, the good times won’t be back anytime soon if ever..
How soon we forget that the pre-Covid world we were living in was exponentially growing more lethal to people and planet. We were hurtling down a highway, pedal to the metal, leading to the death of the human spirit and the collapse of the global ecosphere. So while we should and must debate its terms and who is going to apply them, a Great Reset of our former way of life had become nothing short of an existential imperative. That’s where all current social and political commentary should begin, with that fundamental acknowledgment. And it’s precisely because Caitlin does begin there, that her blog is essential reading.
I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website……..
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This is the last message I’m posting today – thank goodness for that.
~
In my original message on this article, I admitted upfront that I was “off-topic” and that I would not post again for the day, but since that one didn’t go through, I figure I can’t be held to my own internal commitment that I intended on making – cause somebody didn’t keep their end of the deal.
~
So in a weird way, I’m wondering if the image associated with this article (at the top) is one of the ones who had something a little bit more to do with the so-called insurrection at the capital. Oh, it was so “scary”. I’m guessing the answer to that question is a resounding YES. I just want the facts please. The facts and nothing but the facts.
~
Fact that and over and out!
~
I won’t post again today now that I got this off my chest.
China is a serious problem.
Too bad the U.S. has so thoroughly compromised it’s moral and ethical integrity, leaving it with little room to negotiate.
Too bad there isn’t a third party to reign in the forces of both China and the U.S.
Biden is the latest puppet of the Deep State. You can ignore top state officials. Study the elite globalists and observe what they are doing and where they are taking the world. You can also ignore what they say.
Let me try to say this again. Sorry if there is a double-post. My first one said it was “verified” (even though I know I got one image wrong), but then it never showed up.
~
Anyhow, I just wanted to put out my thanks here for all the great discourse. Seems like it has been getting better from my perspective. I did however, print this message prior to hitting the “Post Comment” button, and now I’m gonna get just a little snippet for the sake of posterity. No harm in that.
~
Sincerely,
BK
“How do I know this will happen? Well besides the fact that it is happening already and has been in the works for months, I know it because it’s what happened last time.” No, Caitlin, you do not KNOW this will happen. You make a great case for the likelihood of its happening, almost the inevitability of its happening, but NO ONE KNOWS what the future will bring. History is chock full of surprises, reversals, inversions, etc.–which seem to come precisely when some second-rate thinkers presumptuously declare its end or lay out its predetermined path. If there’s one lesson we should have drawn from Covid, it’s THIS. Hell, Caitlin, it’s a lesson you yourself teach us every time you talk about that mass enlightenment open to us, if only we would open the door.
You do know that she accurately predicted this “ChinaGate” attack on Biden, from before the election… Right?
All three of the groups that Blinken mentioned China for their “treatment” – have ties to CIA destabilization and separatist campaigns… https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/09/15/is-langley-unleashing-jihad-against-china-in-xinjiang/
So China reacts to US meddling efforts in their internal politics (which the US would NEVER tolerate, occuring in a reverse fashion) – and then the US pretends to care about Human Rights. The CIA kicks you under the table – and then the US pretends that your response was aggressive or inappropriate, no matter what it is.
Caitlin’s damn good, extremely preceptive, often prescient, and that’s why a lot of us come here, certainly me. But tell me, Another Worldview, do you believe that she–or anyone else–is a fortune-teller? If not, then she, like all of us, can be wrong, especially about what lies ahead in this crazy, chaotic world. To put it Caitlin’s way: No. One. Knows. The. Future.
When people tell you who they are… believe them. Zbigniew Brzezinski and Fukuyama and company were gaming out the endgame to global domination, back in the 1990’s. Now we have talk about possible Nuclear wars, and first strikes…more “usable” “low-yield” nuclear weapons, etc.. Barring some major miracle she appears to have a firm grasp on where we’re headed as a species and a planet.
This seems less like fortune-telling, and more like reading a pitch, once it’s left the pitcher’s hand… A hitter with a good eye can usually make solid contact. I trust Caitlin’s eye. I’ve yet to see a bad prediction from her.
Yemen and Biden…which she has yet to acknowledge, as far as I can see, on this blog. She had almost completely written off Biden, post after post, as to making any difference in what she correctly called the worst catastrophe going on in the world. Biden sure as hell didn’t solve the problem, but during his first days in office he did take some policy steps in the right direction and deplored the situation using language that Trump was incapable of using. Again to use Caitlin’s language on a different subject: that’s “not nothing.”
What do you think that Biden really did relative to Yemen, that wasn’t ENTIRELY cosmetic? The Saudis and UAE were doing the fighting, alongside Al Qaeda, in Yemen. Has he added them to the list of State Sponsors of Terrorism? Has he removed from the Houthis? That’s a proxy war against Iran – whom he’s continuing to encircle and isolate. So they won’t get US weapons… Will he try to prevent Israel from arming them? Is USAIDCiA Director Samantha Power going to save the lives of those starving? No. They’re just shifting tactics, and backing the Saudi-puppet Government. It looks like a purely iconographic shift in OVERT policy – while the Imperial goals are pursued COVERTLY in a different manner.
https://youtu.be/vXHzxlXhmnA
Abby Martin breaks down Biden’s Lawyerly Weasel Words, and deliberately deceptive language, from his statement – and concludes that these are distinctions with a difference.
Ms Johnstone I hope that you have the time to read this:
~
It’s critical to understand the mindset of the Trump loyalists in general and their outrage that day. Trump followers, who are predominantly white working class, have had their communities and lives decimated by 50 years of neoliberal policy. NAFTA has deindustrialized the country and sent factory jobs overseas. Labor unions have been crushed, causing lower pay and longer working hours – for those who can find work. Social welfare programs have been cut, while home foreclosures and evictions have increased, due in part by predatory practices stemming from banking deregulation. Real wages have fallen, while trillions of dollars have been diverted to the high-tech war industry to fight fruitless foreign wars. Working class communities, once thriving, are now boarded up wastelands. The legacies of their fathers and grandfathers are now in tatters while they scramble to pick up the pieces of their broken American Dream.
~
This fine article can be read here:
A “Capitol” Offense: Selling Out the People By Douglas Johnson!
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/56302.htm
Ron, don’t you think that Caitlin is already on top of virtually all such articles, consumes them almost 24/7 in order to keep abreast of things and be able to write her perceptive posts? Which doesn’t mean that her readers are even close to being equally informed–certainly I’m not–so your links are indeed valuable and appreciated by the likes of me.
I think the theatricality of the hate-Russia hate-China game is being slighted here. The American ruling class needs an enemy, either Eurasia or Eastasia. It doesn’t matter who or what they are. Lies are told, not because they accomplish anything, but out of a sense of exhaustion, a lack of energy. Further enemies, ever more clownish, will be found at home. Meanwhile America crumbles down.
There’s a danger, though, of the theatricality becoming reality.
For example, https://warisboring.com/us-navy-sends-two-aircraft-carriers-into-the-south-china-sea/
“The aircraft carriers USS Nimitz and USS Theodore Roosevelt and their strike groups met in the contentious South China Sea for joint operations on Tuesday, according to a Navy statement.” (Feb. 9th)
A miscalculation could lead to an escalation, rapidly becoming a full on war.
Ron, I appreciate the articles you recommend.
Just turn the following quote (and everything else) around:
From “Biden has been vocal about his desire to ‘confront China’s economic abuses, counter its aggressive, coercive actions, push back on China’s attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.’”
to “Putin has been vocal about his desire to ‘confront the U.S.’ economic abuses, counter its aggressive, coercive actions, push back on their attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.’”
How would the U.S. react? War! War! War! They declared War! We are preparing to First Strike with nuclear weapons! Total world casualties may be 95%, but, by God, they declared War!
The doctrine of US exceptionalism holds that it’s entirely different when other countries behave like they do.
Biden is not a socialist. Democrats are not socialists or communists. Trump was not a Russian Puppet. Republican voters are not fascists and neither are most Democratic Party voters (although their leaders may be). Unfortunately, the game of putrid chess played by United States demagogues (as well as demagogues in Colombia) is to accuse political opponents of something they are not in order to force defensive reactions in the opposite direction. Perverse rather than merely reverse psychology. So Trump imposed ludicrous sanctions against the Russians and Biden may well do something similar with respect to the Chinese, and the free health care and free education and guaranteed income that deluded change from within pseudo progressives expected when they gave their unwavering support to the Deep State nominee (things that ought to be rights) will, as usual come to naught. It’s a Lucy and Charley Brown football moment. Again! While we await the next existential election where both major parties will again insist that we vote for purported lesser evils and the naïve and easy to fool and mislead electorate once again reacts in the manner Albert Einstein once explained was insane. And all while obvious solutions keep staring us in the face.
“Biden has been vocal about his desire to “confront China’s economic abuses, counter its aggressive, coercive actions, push back on China’s attack on human rights, intellectual property, and global governance.”
While the US Psychopaths In Charge are guilty of exactly the very same thing. They have no objections to such actions, as long as they are in charge of them, and collecting the profit from them. A thing typical of all governments, since they are all saturated with sociopaths and/or psychopaths. Not only do they not have any moral foundation, their insanity prevents them from acknowledging such even exists.
In connection with Creepy Joe’s anti-Russia crapola, the Saker has a most illuminating piece here: http://thesaker.is/why-russia-is-driving-the-west-crazy/
Sorry, wrong link although the one above is good too.
http://thesaker.is/the-headless-chicken-and-the-bear/
I used to follow Saker, Kunstler, Greer, etc. until it struck me that they were essentially old white guys with little to tell me about the new world struggling to be born. How nice it was to be free of the noise, the continual crabbing of the old, especially when I was old and white and crabby myself. Seeking fresh air, I, like many others, found it here and have never felt the slightest inclination to look back at the pontification of my peers.
It was reported on Wednesday that, Crazy Joe, head of the new Washington regime, and President Xi of China had their first conversation via telephone since Joe’s recent ascension to power.
+
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/biden-holds-first-phone-call-xi-both-sides-offer-vastly-different-accounts-what-was-said
+
Perhaps in an attempt at extreme levity the two sides not only disagreed on the substance of every topic discussed but more importantly on WHAT topics were discussed. The reporters mused that the conversation may well have been carried out in the complete absence of translators, though one must admit that it is often difficult for Americans to fathom what Joe has to say in his own native language, allegedly English.
+
Personally, I tend to hold with the theory that Joe was just practicing a few comedic riffs in case the executive or diplomatic functions of his new office prove too daunting and he needs to find another line of work.
+
Recent news items out of the White House underscore the constant use of humor in remarks made by the new president or his high-ranking minions. For example, Crazy Joe, ever the ardent supporter of bastions of despotism like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates or Greater Israel, let loose with the inane and irrelevant observation that China’s President Xi “doesn’t have a democratic bone in his body”–unless he was referring to some hypothetical association with the DNC? Earlier his always entertaining court jester Antony Blinken delivered quite the rip snorter that the “US would stand up for democracy and human rights, signaling a hawkish stance towards China.” Jamal Khashoggi might normally have been sourced as a foremost expert on the noble democratic leanings of Washington’s close allies around the world, but he was unavailable for comment.
+
Well, even if Crazy Joe cannot make us happy, at least he can make us all laugh. That’s gotta count for something, right? Like, now Joe sounds just like Donald Trump, rather than Barack Obama, on the need to persecute Julian Assange to the max for practicing his chosen profession of journalism and truth telling. Punishing war criminals rather than their whistleblowers seems like it would be the rational, moral and preferred course of action. Not necessarily in Joe’s universe! How funny is it, the way he keeps us all guessing in spite of whatever simple pronouncements he might have already made? Lemme tell ya, the guy’s a hoot!
That pic of Ted Cruz, I can’t help but think of the name of the inventor of the toilet.
i too am soft on China. and on Russia. i love their women. their kids also.
i’m soft on Africa. same thing. and i’m really soft on Latinas because i studied their continent, north through Mexico. i love their women. their sweet kids. i am soft on grannies from EVERYWHERE also. Esp. all the ones we killed striving for “body count” victories in places from Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan…
and i’m soft on aMerdRicans who have to live here under advanced methods of semi-fascist power systems that keep them poor and undereducated for racist reasons: i’m soft on blacks, natives, immigrants…from nations we have destroyed and i’m really very hard on the the filthy rich nazis who are trying to take over the world as if Hitler was never defeated and his nightmare fantasy lives on.
Amen Jimmy!
The acts may be the same but I believe that the ” results ” are going to be quite different. I do not think that ” China ” is going to put up with the same nonsense that Russia has put up with. I believe that the Chinese are going to ” push back ” at some point and the United States will go to war or back down and retreat.
Getting the mRNA vaccines – will of course – kill YOU !!
EVERYBODY who values their own lives and those of your family and friends – needs to watch this – it is EPIC !
Spend an hour watching this in its entirety !!
Bill Gates is one evil m/f !!
https://www.lewrockwell.com/political-theatre/dr-sherri-tenpenny-explains-how-the-depopulation-mrna-vaccines-will-start-working-in-3-6-months-video/
Are the vaccines full of self-replicating 5G-enabled hydrogel nanobots? Or have the loonies given up on that angle now the vaccines are available to study and find none?
I find it pretty hard to believe that out of all the employees of Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna, and the regulatory bodies in various countries that have studied these vaccines, no whistleblower has come forward to corroborate this nonsense about how they “will of course – kill YOU !!”
These vaccines contain mRNA that tells our cells how to make parts of the coronavirus spike protein. So far as we know, the spike protein does not make us ill, let alone kill – it enables the virus to get into our cells, and these vaccines contain no virus.
Has this Dr Sherri Tenpenny found mRNA carrying other instructions for something that will kill us? Has Dr Tenpenny even sequenced the mRNA? Or does the video allege that these vaccines do contain viruses or other lethal agents? If so, why aren’t others finding them, now that millions of doses are in circulation, making it possible for labs to get hold of a few vials to study?
Altogether preposterous. A massive international conspiracy, with not a single whistleblower?
As they put it with reference to the “Talking Heads,” STOP MAKING SENSE.
This is how it will work. Once vacinnated your body will react to the coronovirus as you said. No problem. However in 2022 after enough people are vaccinated another more virulent strain will be released. This one will cause such s strong response from your immune system that the response will kill you.
I don’t see how that would serve the interests of the ruling class. A really severe plague would destabilize the political structures they need for their business.
In any case: virulence quickly limits itself by killing off its hosts.
The world is overpopulated, running low on water and oil. Depopulation is their goal. Schwab, gates and the rest are eugenists now renamed to progressives. Killing you as they pretend to help you.
Leaving a world populated by anti-vaxxers and those too poor to have been vaccinated? Just what Schwab and Gates want, no doubt.
The Billionaires will need a servant class… Even the Georgia Guidestones speak of a certain amount left behind. Gates has spoken quite openly about his desires for global Depopulation. His family’s multigenerational connections to the Eugenics movement, get much less press.
Just take the mRNA vaccine and see what happens to you !!
The virus has never been isolated – Russia and China wouldn’t touch the mRNA ‘vaccine’ with a 10 foot pole !!
The restrictions will NEVER be lifted in the WEST !
Russia and China will be back to normal and you will never be allowed to leave your country again !
After wiping out over 200 thousand ZIO/US created and funded ISIS – does Russia brag about it ??
NO – they let the US take the credit !!
The last genuine ‘whistle blower’ to expose America’s WAR crimes was Julian Assange and he has been incarcerated for the last 10 years as an example to other ‘potential’ whistleblowers – DON’T try it !!
I called you out as a SHILL some time back – I was obviously correct !
Not a single one of these so called “vaccines” satisfy the legal or medical definition of a vaccine. They are called “vaccines” to convince us they will prevent us from getting sick, an ability which none of the makers even make a modest claim they will. They do not protect you from contagion at all. They produced a nominal reduction in severity in their tests, and that’s all they produced. On top of their lack of performance, they have been only slightly tested for immediate safety, and not tested at all for long term safety. They are an experiment in progress, for profit, as they sell a product that may kill you a year from now. Bought by a government saturated with lobbyists dedicated to the very same makers who are getting rich by abusing us, and many members of said government getting rich and abusing us with a vaccine that isn’t as well.
“On top of their lack of performance, they have been only slightly tested for immediate safety, and not tested at all for long term safety. They are an experiment in progress, for profit…”
Well said.
The LGBTQCIA believe science to be a conspiracy of old white men. Empire is evil… except when it comes to Covid? Trying to make sense of it is like buying glasses for a duck. Best to enjoy the show
‘Not a single one of these so called “vaccines” satisfy the legal or medical definition of a vaccine.’
Most of these definitions were made before mRNA or adenovirus vector vaccines came along, but Sonopharm’s and Sinovac’s seem to satisfy these definitions:
BMA Illustrated Medical Dictionary – A preparation given to induce immunity against an infectious disease. Most vaccines contain the organisms (or parts of the organisms) against which protection is sought.
Stedman’s Medical Dictionary – a substance which contains antigens to a disease or a weak form of a disease, used to protect people against it
Sinopharm’s, not Sonopharm’s!
“I find it pretty hard to believe that out of all the employees of Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna, and the regulatory bodies…”
Empire and capitalism are only evil when I say so, Humpty Dumpty said with a scornful tone.
Gold. Comedy gold.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et5jeZiXAAcMuv6?format=jpg&name=small
None of them produce immunity. None of the makers claim they do. The only positive effect they produce is some resistance, which reduces severity. Like Ibuprofen reduces pain.
If you really want to depopulate the world you don’t start with a virus that kills mostly old people… or a tainted vaccine that is administered to mostly old people, who were soon to die anyway. If this alleged time bomb has a latent period of 3-6 months as you claim, mostly old people will be the casualties, not the young or the paranoid who refused it. Plenty of time and opportunity to thwart your grand conspiracy theory.
~
Also, if the object is simply to kill and many people as possible, this whole alleged charade is totally unnecessary. Simply dump “novichok” (LOL) or some other potent nuerotoxin into the world drinking supply. Spray it from crop dusters. Hire the White Helmets to deliver it door-to-door. (At least Britain and Germany must know how to make it, or how to get it from Uncle Sam, if you believe their BS.)
~
Or simply set off enough high altitude nukes to produce enough EMP to fry all the world’s power grids forever. Without the amenities of the modern world, 90% of the world’s population, especially in the developed world will be dead within a couple of months. Emerge from your bunkers some years later and claim all the world’s resources, if that is your goal.
But it’s much less trouble to convince a mostly uneducated population to voluntarily insist on their own destruction. It produces a much better optic. Not to mention the available profit from such, as opposed to the cost of other methods. Follow the money. Old but valid advice.
This method allows maximum control of the populace as they die.
Perhaps the paranoid as you call them are the wise. Perhaps the paranoid don’t trust lying governments and big Pharma. Maybe the paranoid are the people who trust their own immune systems and don’t hand over their sovereign bodies to giant money making global companies. The paranoid possibly have no desire to be used as guinea pigs in the great vaccine experiment. Maybe the paranoid know what is taking place right under our noses and have a a strong nose for truth.
Vaccinating the elderly first gives these murderers ‘plausible’ deniability !!
” Oh – they died of old age ” II
Nukes huh – like the ones they used on Tianjin and Beirut ??
Both ports – both chemical storage ( to provide ‘plausible deniability’ ) BOTH had TWO explosions – first one for cover – then the BIGGIE !
I suppose you believe ISIS was an ‘organic’ formation ??
You really should think about seeing someone – regarding your cognitive abilities !
Take Ian ‘ TEX’ Perkins with you !!
The object is to kill the people who are considered ‘liabilities’ – ” Useless Eaters ” as Henry Kissinger called them !!
Welfare recipients – they will cut you off welfare if you don’t get the jab !!
People on prescription medication – 70% of American adults are on some sort of prescription medication – you will need to get the ‘jab’ first before qualifying for your medication !
Look up the killer Hong Kong flu symptoms (1969 ) – exactly the same symptoms !
‘Vaccines’ are meant to protect your for LIFE – Russia and China know it’s the FLU and came up with a ‘vaccine’ that is actually a FLU shot !!
Russia nor China are denying the WESTERN narrative – why would they ??
They would be hysterically attacked by the MSM !
Russia came up with a ‘vaccine’ for the Ebola hoax that was going to kill us all – according to western media – Russia gave the ‘vaccine’ to Africa for FREE – presto – NO more Ebola !!
Was Russia ever praised by the western media ???
Of course not – nor have they ever been praised for wiping our ISIS – notice how ALL the ISIS false flags have stopped ???
In my opinion – the enemies of the ZIO/US – Iran – China and Russia have been dealt a severe strain of the killer flu – it is well known that US bio labs have been collecting DNA from Russians for some years !!
Putin openly spoke about this some years ago !
Russia never called Ebola a ‘hoax’ – that is NOT how Russia does things – Russia has never boasted about it – that is NOT how Russia does things !
Brendon O’Connell concurs Caitlin-his narrative has been spot on for some time.
These sort of comparisons are VERY disturbing and insulting to wetland parasites!
It’s all smoke and mirrors. After demonising Russia for the last four years as having interfered in their election, proven to be nonsense, the Dems’ relations with Russia are compromised. Putin isn’t fooled by any of them. Funneling troops into Syria, which Biden is doing at an accellerated rate, is bound to cause trouble with Russia. Biden has been compromised by China. They will want a return for their $1billion bribe. I don’t anticipate his being hard on China at all. He may posture and flag-wave, but that’s all that will happen.
You are wrong, and the facts will prove you wrong. Please change your opinion as Biden escalates aggressions against China instead of ignoring them like Russiagaters ignored Trump’s Russia warmongering.
In his 1877 will, Cecil Rhodes said this group should be “a society which should have its members in every part of the British Empire working with one object and one idea we should have its members placed at our universities and our schools and should watch the English youth passing through their hands just one perhaps in every thousand would have the mind and feelings for such an object, he should be tried in every way, he should be tested whether he is endurant, possessed of eloquence, disregardful of the petty details of life, and if found to be such, then elected and bound by oath to serve for the rest of his life in his Country. He should then be supported if without means by the Society and sent to that part of the Empire where it was felt he was needed.”
Maybe they’ll want a return on their bribe, but I doubt they’ll get it. The Empire never gives up. Biden must serve his true masters.
China’s leverage will mostly come from connections on Wall St. They want in on the growing domestic market in China, and China has been holding out a carrot. As long as Biden acts tough and keeps feeding the war machine but doesn’t actually attack, business will keep rolling along. I doubt we have much leverage regarding sanctions on China; our economies are too interdependent. Any compromising will be the result of that. I’m with you on the posturing and flag waving. The war machine must also get its $$$.
It will be interesting to see the outcome of Hunter Biden’s laptop revelations and the Justice Department. I think that whole thing might get flushed down the memory hole. Grifters are small potatoes in the global scheme of things.
Global governance? I don’t like the sound of that.
You’ve been living under it for some time. It’s called ‘capitalism’.
Yeah, perhaps – but Gates, Rockefeller, the Davos WEF and Schwab have a plan for a NEW KIND of Global Governance. LOCKSTEP, Event201 and now “The Great Reset”.
The Rothschild’s fund EVERYTHING – head of the snake !