UN Ambassador and Clairvoyant Prognosticator of the Transmundane Nikki Haley has foreseen that, if there are any future chemical weapons attacks in the Syrian province of Idlib, it will most definitely be the Syrian government that is responsible and not the multiple terrorist factions in the area.
“If they want to continue to go the route of taking over Syria, they can do that,” said Nikki Haley at a UN press conference today, without explaining how a nation’s only recognized government can ‘take over’ the country it governs. “But they cannot do it with chemical weapons. They can’t do it assaulting their people. And we’re not gonna fall for it. If there are chemical weapons that are used, we know exactly who’s gonna use them.”
Here's video of Nikki Haley saying this of the Syrian regime: “If they want to continue to go the route of taking over Syria, they can do that, but they can not do it with chemical weapons." pic.twitter.com/F7y1bNvO2n
— Samuel Oakford (@samueloakford) September 4, 2018
Haley was referring to the Syrian government’s impending push to complete its military campaign of recapturing its land from the terrorist factions and militias who, with extensive help from the US and its allies, have been holding communities hostage in a failed attempt to take over Syria. Her supernatural prophecy is just the latest in an increasingly bizarre string of claims being advanced by political figures and establishment media that the Assad government is planning to use chemical weapons to complete that campaign in Idlib.
Their narrative is that the Russian government’s warnings of a plot by the Al Qaeda-linked terrorist factions occupying the region to stage a chemical weapons attack and frame the Syrian government for it are actually just a preemptive “smoke screen” to allow them to get away with committing war crimes. When Haley said “we’re not gonna fall for it,” this is the ‘it’ she was referring to.
So let’s unpack that a bit. I’m going to propose two different possibilities to you, and you decide for yourself which one is the more likely event to occur in the future:
Possibility 1: The actual, literal terrorist factions occupying Idlib are on the cusp of defeat with nowhere to escape to. They know for a fact that the US and its allies have launched repeated attacks on the Syrian government following chemical weapons allegations without first waiting for an investigation into those allegations. They also know for a fact that multiple high level officials in the western alliance have stated they will carry out aggressive attacks against the Syrian government in retaliation for any perceived chemical weapons attacks, and, thanks to the public prognostications from Madame Haley’s crystal ball, they also know that the Syrian government has already been assigned blame for any such attack in advance. Knowing all of these things, with their backs against the wall with the absolute certainty that getting the western military alliance on their side is their last and only chance, they get their hands on some chemical weapons and kill some of the civilians they’ve captured.
Possibility 2: On the cusp of victory, the Assad government decides to do the one thing that risks a US-led regime change military intervention in order to accomplish the crucial strategic masterstroke of killing a few kids with chlorine or sarin in front of a bunch of White Helmets cameras.
While you are weighing those two options, consider for a moment the fact that the US and its allies have an extensive history of attempting to control who governs Syria, and indeed plotted to create a violent uprising exactly as it occurred in 2011. Not after the violence had already started, but years in advance.
This is not my opinion, and it is not a conspiracy theory. It is a known fact that you can verify for yourself:
- Here is a 2006 WikiLeaks cable in which the US government is seen exploring possible factions which could be incentivized to rise up against Assad, and ways in which psyops could be used to ensure widespread violence.
- Here is a declassified CIA memo from 1986 in which the Central Intelligence Agency is seen exploring ways in which sectarian tensions can be inflamed to provoke a violent uprising in Syria. Here is a useful article featuring excerpts from the memo showing some jarring parallels between what was being planned and what happened a quarter century later.
- Here is a video clip of General Wesley Clark naming Syria among the countries scheduled by the Pentagon for regime change in the wake of 9/11.
- Here is a video clip of the former Foreign Minister of France stating in plain language that he was informed by British government insiders in 2009 that a violent Syrian uprising was being planned, two years before the violence erupted.
- Here is an article featuring a video of the former Qatari Prime Minister stating that the US and its allies were involved in the violence from the very beginning.
- Here is an article from May of 2011 reporting on some of the extremely suspicious provocations that led to the outbreak of widespread violence. Here’s another from March 2011. Here’s another from December 2011.
You get the picture. If a man had documented his plans to murder his wife with an axe, and those plans were found after his wife turned up dead of axe wounds exactly as he’d planned them, and multiple people in the area said they’d heard him murdering her with an axe, the primary suspect in that case would not be the neighbor’s cat.
President Bashar al-Assad of Syria must not recklessly attack Idlib Province. The Russians and Iranians would be making a grave humanitarian mistake to take part in this potential human tragedy. Hundreds of thousands of people could be killed. Don’t let that happen!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 3, 2018
The violence in Syria was planned and orchestrated years in advance, and now hundreds of thousands of human beings are dead as a direct result. And these monsters are now pretending to be concerned about human rights?
No. Get out of Syria, you absolute ghouls. Everyone responsible for perpetrating and sustaining these horrors should spend the rest of their lives in a Hague cell. If there is a chemical weapons attack as the Syrian government moves to recapture Idlib, the last people anyone should believe is the psychopathic governments who are responsible for this catastrophe in the first place.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
Stephen Sadd / September 7, 2018
Why would the US secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, contend that the battle for Idlib would lead to an escalation when, in reality, it would rid Syria of a big terrorist group, numbering 10,000 only in Idlib? How fighting terrorists in Syria is escalation if doing the same thing in Afghanistan isn’t?
Stephen Sadd / September 6, 2018
Thanks heaps for putting this wonderfully truthful article on zerohedge! You are a blessing Caitlin! Thank you.
Stephen Sadd / September 6, 2018
Anyone here paying off a property mortgage in Australia best have a look here : “Housing Wipe-Out: No Bids or Even Bidders at Numerous Australia Housing Auctions”. https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economics/housing-wipe-out-no-bids-or-even-bidders-at-numerous-australia-housing-auctions-l01MgvjMF0-RdXRBjO7gfA/
elkojohn / September 5, 2018
You nailed it again Caitlin – with hard facts.
But as we all know, the U.S. war machine
never lets facts get in its way –
and operates under the rubric: ‘ ‘ might makes right ‘ ‘
Harry S Nydick / September 5, 2018
Of course this topic, except for the recent idiotic remarks of Nikki Haley, has been discussed over and over again. While, to quote John Lennon, I do “imagine there’s no countries’ and “people sharing all the world,” it’s not that I dislike my country. It’s the gluttonous, murderous bastards in charge – and the bigoted portion of the populace – that I outright hate.
While I could never be drawn to violence, except in self-defense, I have slowly, recently, begun to understand how otherwise normal, mild-mannered people can sometimes be driven to despair, followed by murder. If you back someone into a corner, with no hope of escape to avoid death, the only alternative is to use any means – even murder – to escape. And that can apply to both physical AND emotional threats to ones sanity and very life.
Still people like Nikki Haley advertise their bigotry and bullshit, the moment they look at you, or from the very first syllable that exits their mouths. There is so much of that now, I’m not sure that it will be possible, without violent revolution that may never come, to stop the U.S. from continuing its slide into full blown totalitarianism.
Ishkabibble / September 5, 2018
You know, movies such as The Matrix, Tomorrowland, The International, Enemy of the State, Eagle Eye, Echelon Conspiracy, Dr. Strangelove, Fail Safe, Seven Days In May are just a few of the movies with great, relevant political messages. But the most relevant for what we have seen develop since 9/11 in the MSM is the classic movie “Network”. If you haven’t seen it, make sure you do because some of the diatribes by Howard Beale and Arthur Jenson are so relevant to today, that it is downright eerie. Here is just one example:
voza0sb / September 5, 2018
United States of Terrorism never sleeps.
AriusArmenian / September 5, 2018
Caitlin as usual drives a bulldozer through US/UK agitprop and disinformation.
I would add the demented UK agencies today stepping up their false flag against Russia.
That US and UK leaders are making more false flag pre-operation noise than before other operations.
That the US and UK look and sound desperate.
If the false flag script keeps running we are likely in for a very dangerous crisis.
Watch the movie 13 Days and what our demented leaders of today would have done.
Sea Clearly / September 5, 2018
In a series of Narrated Setups: First, Star Chamber interests decide what directions and actions are needed to fulfill what has been chosen for implementation. Next (after successful steps), many months (or even years) beforehand, they dispense Talking Points to concerted operatives, pliable/collusive publications, and Fronted or “reliable” “news” sources. Then, the people are (sold) “informed” incrementally as to what is inevitably upcoming. Thus, under the guise of Facts simply being reported, it works (exceedingly) as a well-timed machine.
Newscasters Agree: A Christmas Present Or Two Or Ten Edition
quaid hutchinson / September 5, 2018
Excellent collection of resources in this article CJ. However, I’m not sure if the ZeroHedge article is accurate with it’s interpretation of the declassified CIA memo:
“While the 1986 CIA report makes a case in its concluding paragraph for “a Sunni regime controlled by business-oriented moderates” in Syria, the authors acknowledge that the collapse of the Ba’ath state could actually usher in the worst of all possible outcomes for Washington and the region: “religious zealots” might seek to establish “an Islamic Republic”.”
What the authors actually acknowledge as the worst possible outcome for Washington would be “chronic instability – occasioned by a series of military coups – that denied Syria coherent leadership and rendered it an even more volatile force in the region.”
Somewhat ironically, the actual result will likely be closer to the next worst-case scenario that the authors of the memo feared: “the rise of a strong Alawi regime dominated by the military.”
While Assad will not allow the military to dominate his regime, there can be no doubt that the most battle hardened, experienced military in the middle east today is the SAA.
Le Samourai / September 5, 2018
In his tweet, Trump doesn’t refer to CW; reading between the lines, the inference is – please don’t target the CIA assets embedded with Warshingtons terrorists.
Russia and Iran have decimated a number of CIA & Mossad hot spots …
Gary Watts / September 5, 2018
You do marvellous research and I do love your writing style Caitlin. Thank you for your efforts. That video of Nikki Hayey’s statement is dumbfounding. She reminds me of a teenage school yard bully who is not very bright… How she can keep a straight face when she is delivering her BS is beyond me. Caitlin, Perhaps if she was nominated for an acting award, she would be dumb enough to accept it if she won. I am sorry, but she has zero credibility for me.
I agree that you are dead on the money with your logical analysis of this evolving false flag gas attack in Syria and your neighbour’s cat analogy is precious.
Actually, I am curious as to how readers would react if a gas attack was to eventuate given all the exposure and analysis of the potential threat. What does it take for the “Good me to do nothing.” concept to sink in?
Robyn / September 5, 2018
I’m currently reading
Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion with Radical Islam by Mark Curtis.
The UK has been plotting against Syria for around 70 years. They are evil.
Stephen Sadd / September 5, 2018
“…let us draw up three chairs, a screen and three buckets for Trump and his sidekicks to puke into as we show them the movie of what is actually happening in Syria, caused by the very forces they back. OK roll the film, three two one, zero… Scene One: a look of utter horror on the face of Sister Margaret, fleeing….”
See more at http://www.pravdareport.com/opinion/columnists/04-09-2018/141527-trump_terrorists-0/
roy / September 5, 2018
Exactly correct, Caitlin.
Rob / September 5, 2018
The average American (and I suspect the average citizen of most other countries) is barely even aware of international affairs. As an example, the United States is currently fighting wars(directly or by proxy) in Afghanistan, Syria and Yemen, in addition to which it is assassinating so-called terrorists in many other countries on a regular basis, and yet, almost no one even thinks, let alone talks, about any of it. So if the ghouls of war and their stenographers in the media trumpet a supposed chemical attack by the Syrian government, most Americans will simply shrug and say “boy that’s really bad. I think we should punish them.” People are not simply misinformed, they are indifferent.
frankly / September 5, 2018
It’s not enough to sell or get rid of your TV, destroy it and cancel any and all newspapers while you are at it. Hollywood movies, nope. You can’t hear sane words when craziness is pouring in from every corner.
Thomas E Davis / September 5, 2018
It must take an outsider–auslander or just plain Aussie–to tell us in the US (so that we actually understand) how fucking evil our country is. Thanks.
Stephen Sadd / September 5, 2018
I cannot add to this! Great stuff Caitlin, good to see the TRUTH finally being released in Australia! Love to you!
JRGJRG / September 5, 2018
Killing hundreds of thousands of Syrians to punish Assad for allegedly killing his own people with gas makes no sense at all, even if it were true, which it isn’t! Kill ratio is thousands to one. How is this any less evil? Do people really think there’s any logic to this? I must be stupid because I don’t get it. Please, someone, explain to me how this is reasonable.
MalW71 / September 5, 2018
And the Western coalition said: Assad is evil he is killing thousands of his own people with his oppressive regime. That has to be stopped and we are the guys to do just that. We have much more advanced and overwhelming firepower we can kill, maim and displace millions and stop Assad atrocities in no time. Everyone knows we have a fantastic track record of achievements in Iraq, Afghanistan & Libya to name just a few of our interventionist success stories.”Yeah that’s right isn’t it Michelle here have another candy. Its Trumps turn now. Pity he couldn’t come today this is a great show.”
Relentless / September 5, 2018
Excellent commentary on the reality of Evil in Our World which is bent on Syria’s destruction. Discernment is a gift from omnipresent, omniscience, eternal TRUTH and JUSTICE. We know that the current totalitarian system has zero tolerance for truth and will continue living the lie right to its bitter violent end.
JRGJRG / September 5, 2018
Legally speaking under US Evidence theory, she’s talking about the “Hillmon doctrine” for admissibility of evidence. It has been long established—since Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Hillmon, 145 U.S. 285 (1892)—that statements of an individual’s present intention to do a future act may be admitted to prove that the individual did in fact do the act. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Life_Insurance_Co._of_New_York_v._Hillmon
David / September 5, 2018
What really pisses me off is that the war monger ghouls think we are stupid enough to believe the pure BS like Nikki Haley’s statement, AND THEY ARE RIGHT. I live in a world surrounded by people who are now talking about the “Evil Assad” and such. I feel like I’m going insane.